Black Sunday – If Sherlock Holmes Or Sir Hercule Poirot Investigated The Easter Sunday Massacre
By Basil Fernando –
In answering the call of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Sri Lanka, the faithful living in various parts of the country wore black and attended church as a protest against the failure to provide justice for all those who were killed in the Easter Sunday bombings in 2019. They also participated in silent protests. This Black Sunday is a good occasion to reflect back, not only on the lives that were lost on that blackened Easter Sunday, but also on the general nature of the threats posed to human life in Sri Lanka.
All this time, the two governments, the one that was in power and the one that is in power now, have concentrated more on creating a political discourse around the Easter Sunday massacre. However, what they have completely failed to focus on is the investigation that was required for a grave crime. No amount of presidential commissions can replace the most primary requirement in dealing with crimes: the need for criminal investigations. Presidential commissions are not and cannot be the means of inquiring into a crime in terms of the criminal law. That is the task of criminal investigators.
In a modern society, the prevention of crime and the punishment for crimes that have already been taken place can happen only when there is a dedicated, competent and efficient criminal justice system. It is the investigators who could find the actual criminals who carried out these bomb attacks and the conspirators who were criminally involved.
Criminal investigations are a function of the police department. It is perhaps the most important function of a police department to have the kind of investigators that could find all the evidence that is required to reveal the facts of a crime and those who are involved in the crime. Gathering of evidence from the point of view of the criminal law and evidence law of a country is the only way by which the criminals can be found and successfully prosecuted.
The people who sit as presidential commissioners are not part of the police investigative division, nor do they have the necessary means and competence to be investigators.
Proverbially, the task of a criminal investigator is illustrated by a character like Sherlock Holmes created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle or Hercule Poirot by Agatha Christie. The criminal investigator uses the methods that have been developed over centuries in order to gather facts relating to a crime and thereafter to analyze these facts to arrive at conclusions about the individuals who were involved in carrying out the crime.
If the Catholic Bishops Conference of Sri Lanka and all others who are concerned with bringing the perpetrators of the bomb blasts that killed a large number of persons are to make a deeper contribution to resolving this neglected problem, their concentration should be on scrutinizing the manner in which the criminal investigations into these bomb blasts have been carried out.
If such scrutiny is carried out, one glaring fact will come to the attention of anyone concerned: that is, that something has gone radically wrong in the criminal investigative capacity of the Sri Lankan police. Whatever may be the cause of this loss of capacity for thorough and comprehensive criminal investigations leading to tangible results, the important matter now is to address the loss of this all-important capacity in order to ensure the security of people. When the policing function of criminal investigations is lost, everything is lost from the point of view of the capacity to investigate and prosecute criminals. That situation has existed in Sri Lanka for the past few decades.
When President Gotabaya speaks of security, he always refers to security in the context of conflicts, like with the LTTE, which is very different to the security that should prevail within a society in normal times. The primary agency in the times of conflict in maintaining national security is the military. However, the primary agency that is in charge of dealing with crimes, including criminal investigations, is the National Police Service. In the comments made by President Gotabaya and other leading figures in the government, there is hardly any mention of the resuscitating of the criminal investigative capacity of the Sri Lankan police.
The same could be said of the previous government also. They, too, completely neglected the development of an independent criminal investigation branch that is not dependent on the manipulations of politicians but carries out their functions only within the professional limits that are part of the philosophies and the practices relating to criminal prosecutions. In fact, in recent times, all the governments have conspired and acted continuously to undermine the criminal investigative capacity of the Sri Lankan police.
By the end of the colonial period, and in the early years after the independence, there were very important developments and many resources were allocated in order to develop a kind of professional criminal investigative department which could stand on par with other similar institutions in other parts of the world. In fact the achievements of the criminal investigators of the time was remarkable.
However, that is not the situation today. Among many causes that have contributed to the present state of deterioration is the manipulation of the criminal investigative departments for various political uses. Using criminal investigative powers to target political opponents or to undo and erase evidence for political reasons have affected the system badly.
The damaged criminal investigation capacity is the source from which Sri Lanka’s inability to conduct serious criminal investigations arose. That is the root that needs to be addressed by those who are demanding accountability for the crimes committed on Easter Sunday and the issue they should concentrate their efforts on.
If that does not happen, all that will happen is a merely repetition of what has happened already during the last two years; that is, a farcical situation that does not ensure justice for the victims and survivors of this massacre. It is not only about this massacre but also about almost all serious crimes.
The prosecutor cannot replace the functions of the investigator. If the investigator fails, all that the prosecutors could do is to make all kinds of public promises and public statements which themselves are essentially farcical in nature.
Thus, those who lost their lives in the Easter Sunday massacre have a message for all the people living in Sri Lanka now: “If the protection of life is to be guaranteed, first of all ensure that the crimes committed against us be criminally investigated and, by doing that, make the loss of our lives meaningful for the rest of the country so that similar occurrences would be prevented by the very knowledge that the country is capable of getting at any criminal of whatever orientation or inclination in the shortest possible time.”
If there was a well-functioning criminal investigation unit, it would have received information about the crime long before it would have happened. For people to trust the police, it is essential that they have a conviction that information that is given to the police will lead to inquiries and that the capacity of the investigators are such that they are capable of finding the truth.
The paralyzed and dysfunctional criminal investigation capacity of the Sri Lankan police is the root cause of the inability to prevent serious crime.
The lives of everybody in Sri Lanka is at risk. If a serious crime happens, it would be an uphill task to get a proper complaint registered at a police station that would lead to the beginning of an investigation. It is so difficult for people to even register a proper complaint at the police stations.
In one such incident, on a matter of attempted murder, a man who was the victim and his family made all possible attempts to get a complaint registered. Initially, the relevant police station had no interest in registering the complaint. After much pestering, when the police moved to registering the complaint, they did it so carelessly that the affected person did not want to sign that statement. Even after getting this unsatisfactory statement, police made no attempt to visit the crime scene and to do any kind of credible investigation. The man had to go to the ASP and SP many times over and over again over a few weeks and, despite of many promises, no investigation was carried out. Thereafter, he complained to the Inspector General of Police, Police Commission and Human Rights Commission. All he got was a letter from the IGP saying that his complaint will be looked into by a senior officer attached to the area where the incident took place. And when this person contacted the assigned officer, he was given a date and when he went there, the investigation into his complaint was postponed for another two months.
That incident is not an exception. That is the way things happen in Sri Lanka to almost everybody who does not have any kind of political clout if he goes to get a complaint registered at a police station.
A neglected policing system with an extremely poor criminal investigation department is what Sri Lanka has to deal with any crimes, including such horrible crimes as the Easter Sunday massacre. It would be nothing less than a joke if those concerned keep on expecting that the criminal perpetrators of this crime would be punished while the nature of the investigating mechanism that exists in Sri Lanka is in such a collapsed state.
It has become the duty of all people of goodwill, including the religious leaders, the intellectuals and everyone, to give highest priority to the demand of immediate actions on the part of the government of Sri Lanka to address the issue of serious defects of the policing system in Sri Lanka and, in particular, the serious defects in the police investigation capacity in Sri Lanka.
If that does not happen, punishing the perpetrators of the Easter Sunday massacre will be a pie in the sky dream.